| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i7-9750H


Description
The 3900X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 756.3 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900X is 2.7 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
906ed
Core
Matisse
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/12
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
72.51k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
756.3k points
276.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900X
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.46k
4.53k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
18.46k
18.24k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.05k
5.76k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.71k
13.01k (x0.55)
TOTAL
54.68k
41.54k (x0.76)

Multithread

3900X

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
52.65k
24.3k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
265.41k
97.88k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.78k
29.85k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
46.91k
11.93k (x0.25)
TOTAL
505.76k
163.95k (x0.32)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3900X
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.35k
16.32k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
25.87k
23.42k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.72k
6.04k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.86k
13.24k (x0.48)
TOTAL
79.8k
59.03k (x0.74)

Multithread

3900X

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
201.57k
86.92k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
284.41k
126.14k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
145.16k
29.62k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
100.56k
11.86k (x0.12)
TOTAL
731.7k
254.54k (x0.35)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900X
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
16.31k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
25.37k
24.48k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.23k
5.87k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.83k
13.02k (x0.52)
TOTAL
76.38k
59.67k (x0.78)

Multithread

3900X

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
196.31k
87.54k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
290.5k
131.05k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
143.95k
28.47k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.92k
11.8k (x0.18)
TOTAL
695.69k
258.87k (x0.37)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900X
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.73k
25.22k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
21.97k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
5.02k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.22k
10.71k (x0.48)
TOTAL
72.51k
62.92k (x0.87)

Multithread

3900X

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
248.24k
125.56k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
309.66k
115.86k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.01k
25.63k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
58.39k
9.4k (x0.16)
TOTAL
756.3k
276.46k (x0.37)

Performance/W
3900X
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2364 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2949 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1333 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
556 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
7203 points/W
6144 points/W

Performance/GHz
3900X
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5377 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1917 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4831 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
15763 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4