Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i5-10300H
Description
The 3900X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 756.3 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 3.1 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 756.3 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 3.1 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0652
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
72.51k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
756.3k points
246.07k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
15.65k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
25.37k
23.13k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.23k
5.66k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.83k
11.43k (x0.46)
TOTAL
76.38k
55.87k (x0.73)
Multithread
3900X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
196.31k
26.77k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
290.5k
43.81k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
143.95k
10.17k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.92k
11.91k (x0.18)
TOTAL
695.69k
92.66k (x0.13)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.73k
27.14k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
24.75k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
5.73k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.22k
11.84k (x0.53)
TOTAL
72.51k
69.47k (x0.96)
Multithread
3900X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
248.24k
105.77k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
309.66k
107.47k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.01k
24.82k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
58.39k
8.02k (x0.14)
TOTAL
756.3k
246.07k (x0.33)
Performance/W
3900X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2364 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2949 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1333 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
556 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
7203 points/W
5468 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5377 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1917 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4831 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
15763 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4