Ryzen 9 3900X vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Description
The 3900X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 756.3 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 1.4 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 756.3 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 1.4 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a70f41
Core
Matisse
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
105 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2019
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
72.51k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
756.3k points
553.41k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900X
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
16.73k
32.74k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
27.35k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
14.23k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.22k
27.41k (x1.23)
TOTAL
72.51k
101.73k (x1.4)
Multithread
3900X
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
248.24k
236.69k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
309.66k
202.63k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.01k
102.8k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
58.39k
11.28k (x0.19)
TOTAL
756.3k
553.41k (x0.73)
Performance/W
3900X
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
2364 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2949 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1333 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
556 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
7203 points/W
18447 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900X
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5377 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1917 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4831 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
15763 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4