| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i7-1280P


Description
The 3900X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 756.3 k points while the i7-1280P gets 468.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900X is 1.6 times faster than the i7-1280P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
906a3
Core
Matisse
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
12/24
14/20
TDP
105 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
72.51k points
91.45k points
Mean multithread perf.
756.3k points
468.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900X
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
4.46k
6.94k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
18.46k
18.46k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.05k
11.27k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.71k
13.6k (x0.57)
TOTAL
54.68k
50.27k (x0.92)

Multithread

3900X

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
52.65k
44.01k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
265.41k
125.05k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.78k
76.28k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
46.91k
15.52k (x0.33)
TOTAL
505.76k
260.85k (x0.52)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3900X
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
17.35k
22.72k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
25.87k
23.88k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.72k
12.75k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.86k
13.71k (x0.49)
TOTAL
79.8k
73.05k (x0.92)

Multithread

3900X

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
201.57k
151.95k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
284.41k
160.95k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
145.16k
84.9k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
100.56k
15.91k (x0.16)
TOTAL
731.7k
413.72k (x0.57)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900X
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
22.76k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
25.37k
25.2k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.23k
12.64k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.83k
13.33k (x0.54)
TOTAL
76.38k
73.92k (x0.97)

Multithread

3900X

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
196.31k
149.83k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
290.5k
170.43k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
143.95k
83.32k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.92k
15.67k (x0.24)
TOTAL
695.69k
419.25k (x0.6)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900X
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
16.73k
39.78k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
26.06k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
12.44k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.22k
13.17k (x0.59)
TOTAL
72.51k
91.45k (x1.26)

Multithread

3900X

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
248.24k
209.96k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
309.66k
170.21k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.01k
72.04k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
58.39k
16.09k (x0.28)
TOTAL
756.3k
468.3k (x0.62)

Performance/W
3900X
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
2364 points/W
7499 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2949 points/W
6079 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1333 points/W
2573 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
556 points/W
575 points/W
TOTAL
7203 points/W
16725 points/W

Performance/GHz
3900X
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
8287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5377 points/GHz
5429 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1917 points/GHz
2592 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4831 points/GHz
2744 points/GHz
TOTAL
15763 points/GHz
19051 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4