Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i5-8350U
Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-8350U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i5-8350U gets 112.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 6.1 times faster than the i5-8350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i5-8350U gets 112.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 6.1 times faster than the i5-8350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
806ea
Core
Matisse
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2019
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
38.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
112.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
16.74k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
14.66k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
2.79k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
4.12k (x0.18)
TOTAL
74.97k
38.31k (x0.51)
Multithread
3900
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
51.05k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
45.59k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
10.69k (x0.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
4.78k (x0.13)
TOTAL
687.5k
112.12k (x0.16)
Performance/W
3900
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
3403 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
3039 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
7475 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900
i5-8350U
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
4650 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
4071 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
776 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
10642 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4