| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i5-6600K


Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-6600K is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 620.2 k points while the i5-6600K gets 209.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900 is 3 times faster than the i5-6600K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
506e3
Core
Matisse
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/4
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2019
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
59.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
209.28k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900
i5-6600K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.16k
17.24k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
23.75k
26.5k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.32k
6.45k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.17k
9.09k (x0.39)
TOTAL
72.4k
59.28k (x0.82)

Multithread

3900

i5-6600K
Test#1 (Integers)
174.73k
68.47k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
275.63k
105.05k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125.65k
25.24k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
44.17k
10.5k (x0.24)
TOTAL
620.18k
209.28k (x0.34)

Performance/W
3900
i5-6600K
Test#1 (Integers)
2688 points/W
721 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4240 points/W
1106 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1933 points/W
266 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
680 points/W
111 points/W
TOTAL
9541 points/W
2203 points/W

Performance/GHz
3900
i5-6600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3758 points/GHz
4420 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5524 points/GHz
6795 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2167 points/GHz
1653 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5388 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
16838 points/GHz
15199 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4