Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i5-5675R
Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 3.5 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 3.5 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
40671
Core
Matisse
Bradwell-H
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2019
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
194.2k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
4.39k
4.14k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
14.35k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
4.94k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.57k
5.47k (x0.22)
TOTAL
53.69k
28.91k (x0.54)
Multithread
3900
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
48.45k
16.02k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
230.81k
54.6k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.82k
18.69k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
54.73k
16.87k (x0.31)
TOTAL
456.8k
106.18k (x0.23)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3900
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
12.86k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
24.55k
16.85k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.55k
5.19k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.28k
5.49k (x0.21)
TOTAL
75.97k
40.39k (x0.53)
Multithread
3900
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
181.33k
50.07k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
261.01k
64.61k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
126.62k
19.84k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
66.64k
17.09k (x0.26)
TOTAL
635.6k
151.6k (x0.24)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
16.16k
12.88k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
23.75k
18.27k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.32k
5.12k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.17k
5.45k (x0.24)
TOTAL
72.4k
41.72k (x0.58)
Multithread
3900
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
174.73k
49.91k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
275.63k
70.3k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125.65k
19.69k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
44.17k
16.92k (x0.38)
TOTAL
620.18k
156.83k (x0.25)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
21.91k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
18.59k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
5.2k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
5.72k (x0.25)
TOTAL
74.97k
51.43k (x0.69)
Multithread
3900
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
84.92k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
72.09k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
20.13k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
17.07k (x0.46)
TOTAL
687.5k
194.2k (x0.28)
Performance/W
3900
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
2988 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4