Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i5-10600K
Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i5-10600K gets 365.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-10600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i5-10600K gets 365.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-10600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0655
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/12
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
74.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
365.67k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
30.27k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
26.42k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
6.07k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
11.33k (x0.5)
TOTAL
74.97k
74.09k (x0.99)
Multithread
3900
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
164.69k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
156.45k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
37.39k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
7.15k (x0.19)
TOTAL
687.5k
365.67k (x0.53)
Performance/W
3900
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
1317 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
1252 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
2925 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
6306 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5505 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
1264 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
2361 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
15436 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4