Ryzen 9 3900 vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 1.2 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 1.2 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a70f41
Core
Matisse
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
65 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2019
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
553.41k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
32.74k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
27.35k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
14.23k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
27.41k (x1.22)
TOTAL
74.97k
101.73k (x1.36)
Multithread
3900
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
236.69k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
202.63k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
102.8k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
11.28k (x0.31)
TOTAL
687.5k
553.41k (x0.8)
Performance/W
3900
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
18447 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4