Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i9-13900KF
Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-13900KF is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i9-13900KF gets 1660 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900KF is 2.4 times faster than the 3900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i9-13900KF gets 1660 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900KF is 2.4 times faster than the 3900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
b0671
Core
Matisse
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/24
24/32
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
September 2019
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
128.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
1660.01k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
61.1k (x3.63)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
31.23k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
17.57k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
18.89k (x0.84)
TOTAL
74.97k
128.79k (x1.72)
Multithread
3900
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
767.22k (x3.34)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
576.38k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
284.31k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
32.09k (x0.87)
TOTAL
687.5k
1660.01k (x2.41)
Performance/W
3900
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
6138 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
4611 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
2274 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
257 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
13280 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
10535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5384 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
3030 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
3257 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
22206 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4