Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i5-13400
Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
b06f2
Core
Matisse
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/24
10/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
497.83k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
47.01k (x2.79)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
26.73k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
14.28k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
12.1k (x0.54)
TOTAL
74.97k
100.11k (x1.34)
Multithread
3900
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
228.2k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
160.28k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
71.12k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
38.23k (x1.04)
TOTAL
687.5k
497.83k (x0.72)
Performance/W
3900
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
7659 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4