| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i7-12700K


Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-12700K is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i7-12700K gets 1034.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700K is 1.5 times faster than the 3900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
90672
Core
Matisse
Alder Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/24
12/20
TDP
65 W
190 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
25600 kB
Date
September 2019
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
110.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
1034.06k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.39k
8.44k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
21.1k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
14.52k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.57k
12.87k (x0.52)
TOTAL
53.69k
56.92k (x1.06)

Multithread

3900

i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
48.45k
70.7k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
230.81k
251.29k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.82k
159.92k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
54.73k
32.47k (x0.59)
TOTAL
456.8k
514.38k (x1.13)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
52.13k (x3.09)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
28.97k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
15.04k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
14.07k (x0.62)
TOTAL
74.97k
110.2k (x1.47)

Multithread

3900

i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
458.8k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
377.45k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
171.31k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
26.51k (x0.72)
TOTAL
687.5k
1034.06k (x1.5)

Performance/W
3900
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
2415 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
1987 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
902 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
140 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
5442 points/W

Performance/GHz
3900
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
10425 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
3008 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
2813 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
22040 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4