Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i5-11400T
Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 456.8 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 6.8 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 456.8 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 6.8 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0671
Core
Matisse
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/12
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
31.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
67.1k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.39k
3.51k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
14.2k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
7.63k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.57k
6.06k (x0.25)
TOTAL
53.69k
31.39k (x0.58)
Multithread
3900
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
48.45k
7.4k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
230.81k
31.37k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.82k
18.11k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
54.73k
10.23k (x0.19)
TOTAL
456.8k
67.1k (x0.15)
Performance/W
3900
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
745 points/W
211 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3551 points/W
896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1889 points/W
518 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
842 points/W
292 points/W
TOTAL
7028 points/W
1917 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1021 points/GHz
948 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3951 points/GHz
3838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1800 points/GHz
2062 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5714 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
TOTAL
12486 points/GHz
8485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4