| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Core i5-8259U


Description
The 4750GE is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-8259U is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4750GE gets a score of 469.7 k points while the i5-8259U gets 225.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 4750GE is 2.1 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
806ea
Core
Renoir
Coffee Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2020
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
60.99k points
56.4k points
Mean multithread perf.
469.67k points
225.2k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4750GE
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
22.59k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
26.26k
20.76k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
4.73k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
8.31k (x0.99)
TOTAL
60.99k
56.4k (x0.92)

Multithread

4750GE

i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
159.87k
94.18k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
215.44k
85.23k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.45k
20.78k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
25.02k (x4.24)
TOTAL
469.67k
225.2k (x0.48)

Performance/W
4750GE
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
4568 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6155 points/W
3044 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2527 points/W
742 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
169 points/W
894 points/W
TOTAL
13419 points/W
8043 points/W

Performance/GHz
4750GE
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
3942 points/GHz
5944 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6107 points/GHz
5464 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2185 points/GHz
1245 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1950 points/GHz
2188 points/GHz
TOTAL
14184 points/GHz
14841 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4