| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Core i9-13900HX


Description
The 7840HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 877.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 1.4 times faster than the 7840HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
b0671
Core
Phoenix
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
35 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
91.11k points
104.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.34k points
877.5k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7840HS
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
31.57k
49.8k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
26.07k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.42k
13.65k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.93k
15.38k (x0.7)
TOTAL
91.11k
104.9k (x1.15)

Multithread

7840HS

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
265.26k
375.69k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
226.13k
329.21k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.46k
157.71k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.49k
14.89k (x0.9)
TOTAL
622.34k
877.5k (x1.41)

Performance/W
7840HS
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
7579 points/W
6831 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6461 points/W
5986 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3270 points/W
2867 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
471 points/W
271 points/W
TOTAL
17781 points/W
15955 points/W

Performance/GHz
7840HS
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6190 points/GHz
9222 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4941 points/GHz
4828 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2436 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4299 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
17866 points/GHz
19427 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4