Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Core i3-12100T
Description
The 7840HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.9 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.9 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
90675
Core
Phoenix
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
91.11k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.34k points
330.62k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7840HS
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
31.57k
43.24k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
23.76k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.42k
12.67k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.93k
13.88k (x0.63)
TOTAL
91.11k
93.54k (x1.03)
Multithread
7840HS
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
265.26k
150.28k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
226.13k
126.29k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.46k
45.32k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.49k
8.73k (x0.53)
TOTAL
622.34k
330.62k (x0.53)
Performance/W
7840HS
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
7579 points/W
4294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6461 points/W
3608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3270 points/W
1295 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
471 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
17781 points/W
9446 points/W
Performance/GHz
7840HS
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6190 points/GHz
10546 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4941 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2436 points/GHz
3089 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4299 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
TOTAL
17866 points/GHz
22814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4