Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Core i9-9880H
Description
The 7800X3D is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 1.8 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 1.8 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
906ed
Core
Raphael
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM5
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
120 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
16386 kB
Date
April 2023
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
104.26k points
73.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
704.89k points
381.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7800X3D
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
36.77k
27.81k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
25.88k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.8k
5.65k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.28k
14.19k (x0.48)
TOTAL
104.26k
73.53k (x0.71)
Multithread
7800X3D
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
249.4k
175.69k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
167.65k
166.56k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.85k
35.04k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
182.98k
4.23k (x0.02)
TOTAL
704.89k
381.53k (x0.54)
Performance/W
7800X3D
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
2078 points/W
3904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1397 points/W
3701 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
779 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1525 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
5874 points/W
8478 points/W
Performance/GHz
7800X3D
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
7354 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4680 points/GHz
5392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2961 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5857 points/GHz
2956 points/GHz
TOTAL
20852 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4