Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Core i9-10900KF
Description
The 7800X3D is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.2 times faster than the 7800X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.2 times faster than the 7800X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a0655
Core
Raphael
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/20
TDP
120 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2023
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
104.26k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
704.89k points
825.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7800X3D
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
36.77k
35.87k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
31.43k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.8k
7.34k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.28k
15.73k (x0.54)
TOTAL
104.26k
90.37k (x0.87)
Multithread
7800X3D
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
249.4k
377.56k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
167.65k
347.59k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.85k
88.08k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
182.98k
12.24k (x0.07)
TOTAL
704.89k
825.47k (x1.17)
Performance/W
7800X3D
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
2078 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1397 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1525 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
5874 points/W
6604 points/W
Performance/GHz
7800X3D
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
7354 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4680 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2961 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5857 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
20852 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4