| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Ryzen 9 7950X


Description
Both models 7800X3D and 7950X are based on Zen 4 architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the 7950X gets 1597.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X is 2.3 times faster than the 7800X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a60f12
Core
Raphael
Raphael
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
AM5
AM5
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/32
TDP
120 W
170 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
131072 kB
Date
April 2023
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
104.26k points
121.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
704.89k points
1597.79k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7800X3D
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
36.77k
40.61k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
31.82k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.8k
16.63k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.28k
32.28k (x1.1)
TOTAL
104.26k
121.33k (x1.16)

Multithread

7800X3D

7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
249.4k
683.17k (x2.74)
Test#2 (FP)
167.65k
563.45k (x3.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.85k
286.77k (x2.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
182.98k
64.4k (x0.35)
TOTAL
704.89k
1597.79k (x2.27)

Performance/W
7800X3D
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
2078 points/W
4019 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1397 points/W
3314 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
1687 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1525 points/W
379 points/W
TOTAL
5874 points/W
9399 points/W

Performance/GHz
7800X3D
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
7354 points/GHz
7124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4680 points/GHz
5582 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2961 points/GHz
2917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5857 points/GHz
5663 points/GHz
TOTAL
20852 points/GHz
21286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4