Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
Description
Both models 7800X3D and 7940HS are based on Zen 4 architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the 7940HS gets 678.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 1 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the 7940HS gets 678.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 1 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a70f41
Core
Raphael
Phoenix
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM5
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
120 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2023
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
104.26k points
107.71k points
Mean multithread perf.
704.89k points
678.46k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7800X3D
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
36.77k
37.07k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
29.49k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.8k
14.86k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.28k
26.29k (x0.9)
TOTAL
104.26k
107.71k (x1.03)
Multithread
7800X3D
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
249.4k
286.22k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
167.65k
254.32k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.85k
123.23k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
182.98k
14.69k (x0.08)
TOTAL
704.89k
678.46k (x0.96)
Performance/W
7800X3D
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2078 points/W
8178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1397 points/W
7266 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
3521 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1525 points/W
420 points/W
TOTAL
5874 points/W
19385 points/W
Performance/GHz
7800X3D
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
7354 points/GHz
7129 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4680 points/GHz
5671 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2961 points/GHz
2858 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5857 points/GHz
5055 points/GHz
TOTAL
20852 points/GHz
20713 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4