| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs 4800H


Description
The 7800X3D is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 1.6 times faster than the 4800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
860f01
Core
Raphael
Renoir
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM5
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
120 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2023
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
104.26k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
704.89k points
436.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7800X3D
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
36.77k
16.59k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
23.51k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.8k
9.38k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.28k
7.98k (x0.27)
TOTAL
104.26k
57.47k (x0.55)

Multithread

7800X3D

4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
249.4k
152.43k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
167.65k
195.79k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.85k
83.2k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
182.98k
5.38k (x0.03)
TOTAL
704.89k
436.8k (x0.62)

Performance/W
7800X3D
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
2078 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1397 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1525 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
5874 points/W
9707 points/W

Performance/GHz
7800X3D
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
7354 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4680 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2961 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5857 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
20852 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4