Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The 7800X3D is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 3.6 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 3.6 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
810f10
Core
Raphael
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM5
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2023
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
104.26k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
704.89k points
198.27k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7800X3D
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
36.77k
14.2k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
23.23k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.8k
5.35k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.28k
5.18k (x0.18)
TOTAL
104.26k
47.96k (x0.46)
Multithread
7800X3D
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
249.4k
58.24k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
167.65k
105.72k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.85k
28.73k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
182.98k
5.59k (x0.03)
TOTAL
704.89k
198.27k (x0.28)
Performance/W
7800X3D
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2078 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1397 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1525 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
5874 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
7800X3D
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
7354 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4680 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2961 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5857 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
20852 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4