| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Ryzen 5 1600


Description
The 7800X3D is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 2.3 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
800f82
Core
Raphael
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM5
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2023
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
104.26k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
704.89k points
303.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7800X3D
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
36.77k
14.08k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
22.56k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.8k
5.19k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.28k
16.71k (x0.57)
TOTAL
104.26k
58.53k (x0.56)

Multithread

7800X3D

1600
Test#1 (Integers)
249.4k
86.62k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
167.65k
168.1k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.85k
43.51k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
182.98k
5.16k (x0.03)
TOTAL
704.89k
303.4k (x0.43)

Performance/W
7800X3D
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
2078 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1397 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1525 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
5874 points/W
4668 points/W

Performance/GHz
7800X3D
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
7354 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4680 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2961 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5857 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
20852 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4