| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Core i7-13700T


Description
The 7800X3D is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the i7-13700T gets 755.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700T is 1.1 times faster than the 7800X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
b0671
Core
Raphael
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
1.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/24
TDP
120 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
104.26k points
108.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
704.89k points
755.15k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7800X3D
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
36.77k
48.71k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
28.44k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.8k
14.98k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.28k
16.51k (x0.56)
TOTAL
104.26k
108.64k (x1.04)

Multithread

7800X3D

i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
249.4k
345.34k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
167.65k
274.4k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.85k
118.33k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
182.98k
17.07k (x0.09)
TOTAL
704.89k
755.15k (x1.07)

Performance/W
7800X3D
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
2078 points/W
9867 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1397 points/W
7840 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1525 points/W
488 points/W
TOTAL
5874 points/W
21576 points/W

Performance/GHz
7800X3D
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
7354 points/GHz
9941 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4680 points/GHz
5803 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2961 points/GHz
3058 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5857 points/GHz
3370 points/GHz
TOTAL
20852 points/GHz
22172 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4