| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Core i7-12700H


Description
The 7800X3D is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the i7-12700H gets 685.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 1 times faster than the i7-12700H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
906a3
Core
Raphael
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM5
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/20
TDP
120 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
104.26k points
96.4k points
Mean multithread perf.
704.89k points
685.54k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7800X3D
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
36.77k
42.82k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
26.51k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.8k
13.74k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.28k
13.33k (x0.46)
TOTAL
104.26k
96.4k (x0.92)

Multithread

7800X3D

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
249.4k
298.78k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
167.65k
256.21k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.85k
113.3k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
182.98k
17.25k (x0.09)
TOTAL
704.89k
685.54k (x0.97)

Performance/W
7800X3D
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
2078 points/W
2598 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1397 points/W
2228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
985 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1525 points/W
150 points/W
TOTAL
5874 points/W
5961 points/W

Performance/GHz
7800X3D
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
7354 points/GHz
9110 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4680 points/GHz
5641 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2961 points/GHz
2923 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5857 points/GHz
2836 points/GHz
TOTAL
20852 points/GHz
20511 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4