Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 7800X3D is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the i5-12400F gets 499.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 1.4 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the i5-12400F gets 499.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 1.4 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
90672
Core
Raphael
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
104.26k points
88.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
704.89k points
499.76k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7800X3D
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
36.77k
38.2k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
23.82k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.8k
12.22k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.28k
13.9k (x0.47)
TOTAL
104.26k
88.13k (x0.85)
Multithread
7800X3D
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
249.4k
208.71k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
167.65k
189.91k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.85k
83.66k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
182.98k
17.49k (x0.1)
TOTAL
704.89k
499.76k (x0.71)
Performance/W
7800X3D
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2078 points/W
3211 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1397 points/W
2922 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
1287 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1525 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
5874 points/W
7689 points/W
Performance/GHz
7800X3D
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7354 points/GHz
8682 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4680 points/GHz
5413 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2961 points/GHz
2777 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5857 points/GHz
3158 points/GHz
TOTAL
20852 points/GHz
20031 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4