Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Core i5-12400
Description
The 7800X3D is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the i5-12400 gets 544.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 1.3 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the i5-12400 gets 544.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 1.3 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
90672
Core
Raphael
Arder Lake-S
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
104.26k points
102.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
704.89k points
544.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7800X3D
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
36.77k
48.08k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
25.6k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.8k
14.02k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.28k
14.81k (x0.51)
TOTAL
104.26k
102.51k (x0.98)
Multithread
7800X3D
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
249.4k
230.14k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
167.65k
198.07k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.85k
94.78k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
182.98k
21.64k (x0.12)
TOTAL
704.89k
544.64k (x0.77)
Performance/W
7800X3D
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
2078 points/W
3541 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1397 points/W
3047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
1458 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1525 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
5874 points/W
8379 points/W
Performance/GHz
7800X3D
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
7354 points/GHz
10927 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4680 points/GHz
5819 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2961 points/GHz
3186 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5857 points/GHz
3365 points/GHz
TOTAL
20852 points/GHz
23298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4