Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Core i9-11900H
Description
The 7800X3D is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 1.2 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7800X3D gets a score of 704.9 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 1.2 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
806d1
Core
Raphael
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM5
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
120 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2023
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
104.26k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
704.89k points
584.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7800X3D
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
36.77k
33.38k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
27.12k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.8k
11.69k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.28k
17k (x0.58)
TOTAL
104.26k
89.19k (x0.86)
Multithread
7800X3D
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
249.4k
249.83k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
167.65k
237.26k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.85k
84.18k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
182.98k
13.2k (x0.07)
TOTAL
704.89k
584.47k (x0.83)
Performance/W
7800X3D
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
2078 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1397 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1525 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
5874 points/W
12988 points/W
Performance/GHz
7800X3D
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
7354 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4680 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2961 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5857 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
20852 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4