Ryzen 7 7700X vs Core i9-10900X
Description
The 7700X is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7700X gets a score of 752.6 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 7700X is 1.2 times faster than the i9-10900X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7700X gets a score of 752.6 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 7700X is 1.2 times faster than the i9-10900X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
50657
Core
Raphael
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/20
TDP
105 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
19712 kB
Date
September 2022
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
115.23k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
752.57k points
632.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7700X
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
38.8k
25.97k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
30.25k
22.37k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.58k
5.3k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
30.59k
8.63k (x0.28)
TOTAL
115.23k
62.28k (x0.54)
Multithread
7700X
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
307.13k
281.98k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
261.07k
259.01k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
133.91k
64.87k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
50.47k
26.5k (x0.53)
TOTAL
752.57k
632.35k (x0.84)
Performance/W
7700X
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
2925 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2486 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
481 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
7167 points/W
3832 points/W
Performance/GHz
7700X
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
7186 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5603 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2885 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5665 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
21338 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4