Ryzen 7 7700X vs Core i9-10900KF
Description
The 7700X is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7700X gets a score of 752.6 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.1 times faster than the 7700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7700X gets a score of 752.6 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.1 times faster than the 7700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a0655
Core
Raphael
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/20
TDP
105 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
115.23k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
752.57k points
825.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7700X
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
38.8k
35.87k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
30.25k
31.43k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.58k
7.34k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
30.59k
15.73k (x0.51)
TOTAL
115.23k
90.37k (x0.78)
Multithread
7700X
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
307.13k
377.56k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
261.07k
347.59k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
133.91k
88.08k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
50.47k
12.24k (x0.24)
TOTAL
752.57k
825.47k (x1.1)
Performance/W
7700X
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
2925 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2486 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
481 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
7167 points/W
6604 points/W
Performance/GHz
7700X
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
7186 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5603 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2885 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5665 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
21338 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4