Ryzen 7 6800H vs Xeon Silver 4208
Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.5 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.5 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a40f41
50657
Core
Rembrandt
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
311.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
16.86k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
12.08k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
3.37k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
6.29k (x0.26)
TOTAL
77.93k
38.61k (x0.5)
Multithread
6800H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
150.99k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
118.54k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
33.44k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
8.6k (x0.58)
TOTAL
478.73k
311.57k (x0.65)
Performance/W
6800H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
3666 points/W
Performance/GHz
6800H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4