Ryzen 7 6800H vs Core i9-10900X
Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.3 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.3 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a40f41
50657
Core
Rembrandt
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/20
TDP
45 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
19712 kB
Date
January 2022
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
632.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
25.97k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
22.37k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
5.3k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
8.63k (x0.36)
TOTAL
77.93k
62.28k (x0.8)
Multithread
6800H
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
281.98k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
259.01k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
64.87k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
26.5k (x1.79)
TOTAL
478.73k
632.35k (x1.32)
Performance/W
6800H
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
3832 points/W
Performance/GHz
6800H
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4