| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 6800H vs Core i7-1065G7


Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 6800H is 2.2 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a40f41
706e5
Core
Rembrandt
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Zen 3+
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2022
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
74.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
214.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
28.19k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
22.13k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
10.32k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
14.17k (x0.58)
TOTAL
77.93k
74.82k (x0.96)

Multithread

6800H

i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
86.39k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
86.22k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
32.99k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
8.75k (x0.59)
TOTAL
478.73k
214.34k (x0.45)

Performance/W
6800H
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
5759 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
5748 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
2199 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
583 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
14289 points/W

Performance/GHz
6800H
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
7229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
2646 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
3634 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
19184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4