Ryzen 7 6800H vs Core i5-8259U
Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the i5-8259U is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i5-8259U gets 229 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 2.1 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i5-8259U gets 229 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 2.1 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a40f41
806ea
Core
Rembrandt
Coffee Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
54.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
229k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
21.06k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
19.79k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
4.72k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
8.98k (x0.37)
TOTAL
77.93k
54.55k (x0.7)
Multithread
6800H
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
96.43k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
85.46k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
22.31k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
24.81k (x1.68)
TOTAL
478.73k
229k (x0.48)
Performance/W
6800H
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
3444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
3052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
797 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
886 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
8179 points/W
Performance/GHz
6800H
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
5543 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
5208 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
1241 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
2363 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
14355 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4