Ryzen 7 6800H vs Core i5-6400
Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the i5-6400 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i5-6400 gets 174.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 2.7 times faster than the i5-6400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i5-6400 gets 174.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 2.7 times faster than the i5-6400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a40f41
506e3
Core
Rembrandt
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
48.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
174.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
21.1k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
18.28k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
4.22k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
4.45k (x0.18)
TOTAL
77.93k
48.05k (x0.62)
Multithread
6800H
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
80.03k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
71.1k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
16.19k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
6.73k (x0.46)
TOTAL
478.73k
174.05k (x0.36)
Performance/W
6800H
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
1231 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
2678 points/W
Performance/GHz
6800H
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
6394 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
5539 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
1279 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
14560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4