| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 6800H vs Core i7-6700HQ


Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the i7-6700HQ is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 485.1 k points while the i7-6700HQ gets 205.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 6800H is 2.4 times faster than the i7-6700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a40f41
506e3
Core
Rembrandt
Skylake-H
Architecture
Zen 3+
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
79.87k points
50.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
485.06k points
205.24k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
21.57k
21.33k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
18.34k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.63k
4.44k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.29k
6.44k (x0.27)
TOTAL
79.87k
50.54k (x0.63)

Multithread

6800H

i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
161.42k
91.89k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
217.92k
87.87k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
91.69k
20.61k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
4.87k (x0.35)
TOTAL
485.06k
205.24k (x0.42)

Performance/W
6800H
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3587 points/W
2042 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4843 points/W
1953 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2037 points/W
458 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
312 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
10779 points/W
4561 points/W

Performance/GHz
6800H
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4589 points/GHz
6094 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4976 points/GHz
5240 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2261 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5168 points/GHz
1840 points/GHz
TOTAL
16994 points/GHz
14441 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4