Ryzen 7 6800H vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
Description
Both models 6800H and 6900HX are based on Zen 3+ architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 485.1 k points while the 6900HX gets 462.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1 times faster than the 6900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 485.1 k points while the 6900HX gets 462.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1 times faster than the 6900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a40f41
a40f41
Core
Rembrandt
Rembrandt
Architecture
Zen 3+
Zen 3+
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
79.87k points
87.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
485.06k points
462.36k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
21.57k
24.35k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
26.85k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.63k
11.82k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.29k
24.18k (x1)
TOTAL
79.87k
87.21k (x1.09)
Multithread
6800H
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
161.42k
152.84k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
217.92k
208.12k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
91.69k
88.84k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
12.57k (x0.9)
TOTAL
485.06k
462.36k (x0.95)
Performance/W
6800H
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3587 points/W
3396 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4843 points/W
4625 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2037 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
312 points/W
279 points/W
TOTAL
10779 points/W
10275 points/W
Performance/GHz
6800H
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
4589 points/GHz
4969 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4976 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2261 points/GHz
2413 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5168 points/GHz
4935 points/GHz
TOTAL
16994 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4