| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 6800H vs Ryzen 9 5900HX


Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the 5900HX is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.1 times faster than the 5900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a40f41
a50f00
Core
Rembrandt
Cezanne
Architecture
Zen 3+
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
85.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
421.05k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
23.29k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
25.89k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
11.75k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
24.83k (x1.02)
TOTAL
77.93k
85.76k (x1.1)

Multithread

6800H

5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
138.16k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
192.12k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
80.84k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
9.93k (x0.67)
TOTAL
478.73k
421.05k (x0.88)

Performance/W
6800H
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
3070 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
4269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
1796 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
221 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
9357 points/W

Performance/GHz
6800H
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
5064 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
5628 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
5398 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
18644 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4