| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 6800H vs Ryzen 5 1600


Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.8 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a40f41
800f11
Core
Rembrandt
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Zen 3+
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
272.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
13.67k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
22.28k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
4.99k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
15.22k (x0.63)
TOTAL
77.93k
56.16k (x0.72)

Multithread

6800H

1600
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
81.03k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
145.84k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
39.14k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
6.79k (x0.46)
TOTAL
478.73k
272.8k (x0.57)

Performance/W
6800H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
4197 points/W

Performance/GHz
6800H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4