| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 6800H vs Core i3-13100F


Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.2 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a40f41
b06f5
Core
Rembrandt
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 3+
Zen 3+
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
47.14k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
25.77k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
13.25k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
14.77k (x0.61)
TOTAL
77.93k
100.94k (x1.3)

Multithread

6800H

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
168.51k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
142.8k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
63.57k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
15.34k (x1.04)
TOTAL
478.73k
390.23k (x0.82)

Performance/W
6800H
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
6800H
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4