| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 6800H vs Core i9-13900HX


Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 485.1 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 877.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 1.8 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a40f41
b0671
Core
Rembrandt
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Zen 3+
Zen 3+
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
45 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
79.87k points
104.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
485.06k points
877.5k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
21.57k
49.8k (x2.31)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
26.07k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.63k
13.65k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.29k
15.38k (x0.63)
TOTAL
79.87k
104.9k (x1.31)

Multithread

6800H

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
161.42k
375.69k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
217.92k
329.21k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
91.69k
157.71k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
14.89k (x1.06)
TOTAL
485.06k
877.5k (x1.81)

Performance/W
6800H
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3587 points/W
6831 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4843 points/W
5986 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2037 points/W
2867 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
312 points/W
271 points/W
TOTAL
10779 points/W
15955 points/W

Performance/GHz
6800H
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
4589 points/GHz
9222 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4976 points/GHz
4828 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2261 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5168 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
16994 points/GHz
19427 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4