Ryzen 7 6800H vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a40f41
90675
Core
Rembrandt
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
399.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
33.85k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
20.33k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
10.51k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
11.77k (x0.49)
TOTAL
77.93k
76.46k (x0.98)
Multithread
6800H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
174.21k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
141.31k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
64.86k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
19.01k (x1.29)
TOTAL
478.73k
399.39k (x0.83)
Performance/W
6800H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
6800H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4