Ryzen 7 6800H vs Core i5-1135G7
Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 238.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 2 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 238.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 2 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a40f41
806c1
Core
Rembrandt
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
68.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
238.87k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
25.96k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
23.42k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
10.1k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
8.71k (x0.36)
TOTAL
77.93k
68.19k (x0.87)
Multithread
6800H
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
94.88k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
99.81k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
33.6k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
10.58k (x0.72)
TOTAL
478.73k
238.87k (x0.5)
Performance/W
6800H
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
3389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
3565 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
1200 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
378 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
8531 points/W
Performance/GHz
6800H
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
6180 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
5576 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
2405 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
2075 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
16235 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4