Ryzen 7 5825U vs N95
Description
The 5825U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5825U gets a score of 394 k points while the gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5825U is 4 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5825U gets a score of 394 k points while the gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5825U is 4 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
b06e0
Core
Barcelo
Gracemont
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA FP6
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
84.81k points
37.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
394k points
97.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5825U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.03k
14.82k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
25.48k
10.51k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.5k
5.45k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.81k
6.27k (x0.25)
TOTAL
84.81k
37.06k (x0.44)
Multithread
5825U
Test#1 (Integers)
127.19k
43.01k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
185.99k
32.29k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
75.99k
17.36k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
4.82k (x1)
TOTAL
394k
97.48k (x0.25)
Performance/W
5825U
Test#1 (Integers)
8479 points/W
2868 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
12399 points/W
2152 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5066 points/W
1157 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
323 points/W
322 points/W
TOTAL
26267 points/W
6499 points/W
Performance/GHz
5825U
Test#1 (Integers)
5117 points/GHz
4360 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5662 points/GHz
3093 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2556 points/GHz
1604 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5513 points/GHz
1843 points/GHz
TOTAL
18847 points/GHz
10900 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4