Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Core E5-2620 v3
Description
The 5800X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1.8 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1.8 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
306f2
Core
Vermeer
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
15360 kB
Date
April 2022
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
83.1k points
35.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
631.14k points
357.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X3D
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
18.64k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
24.32k
10.55k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
4.12k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.86k
2.54k (x0.1)
TOTAL
83.1k
35.86k (x0.43)
Multithread
5800X3D
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
181.41k
181.66k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
236.12k
122.09k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
105.13k
47.02k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
108.48k
7.22k (x0.07)
TOTAL
631.14k
357.99k (x0.57)
Performance/W
5800X3D
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1728 points/W
2137 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2249 points/W
1436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/W
553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
6011 points/W
4212 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800X3D
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5020 points/GHz
5826 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5405 points/GHz
3297 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2517 points/GHz
1288 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5525 points/GHz
794 points/GHz
TOTAL
18467 points/GHz
11205 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4