Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Core i5-7400
Description
The 5800X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the i5-7400 gets 173.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 3.6 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the i5-7400 gets 173.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 3.6 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
906e9
Core
Vermeer
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2022
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
83.1k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
631.14k points
173.7k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X3D
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
22.37k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
24.32k
19.46k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
4.44k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.86k
6.41k (x0.26)
TOTAL
83.1k
52.69k (x0.63)
Multithread
5800X3D
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
181.41k
79.57k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
236.12k
71.41k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
105.13k
16.44k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
108.48k
6.27k (x0.06)
TOTAL
631.14k
173.7k (x0.28)
Performance/W
5800X3D
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
1728 points/W
1224 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2249 points/W
1099 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
6011 points/W
2672 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800X3D
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
5020 points/GHz
6392 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5405 points/GHz
5561 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2517 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5525 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
TOTAL
18467 points/GHz
15053 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4