Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Core i5-10400F
Description
The 5800X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1.6 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1.6 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a0655
Core
Vermeer
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
16386 kB
Date
April 2022
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
83.1k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
631.14k points
390.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X3D
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
28.39k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
24.32k
24.89k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
5.78k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.86k
13.19k (x0.53)
TOTAL
83.1k
72.25k (x0.87)
Multithread
5800X3D
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
181.41k
180.2k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
236.12k
163.51k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
105.13k
40.6k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
108.48k
6.48k (x0.06)
TOTAL
631.14k
390.78k (x0.62)
Performance/W
5800X3D
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1728 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2249 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
6011 points/W
6012 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800X3D
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5020 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5405 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2517 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5525 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
18467 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4