Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Core i3-9100
Description
The 5800X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the i3-9100 gets 229.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 2.8 times faster than the i3-9100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the i3-9100 gets 229.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 2.8 times faster than the i3-9100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
906eb
Core
Vermeer
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
83.1k points
66.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
631.14k points
229.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X3D
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
28.03k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
24.32k
24.5k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
5.73k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.86k
8.48k (x0.34)
TOTAL
83.1k
66.74k (x0.8)
Multithread
5800X3D
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
181.41k
107.5k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
236.12k
95.11k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
105.13k
22.02k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
108.48k
4.57k (x0.04)
TOTAL
631.14k
229.2k (x0.36)
Performance/W
5800X3D
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
1728 points/W
1654 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2249 points/W
1463 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/W
70 points/W
TOTAL
6011 points/W
3526 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800X3D
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
5020 points/GHz
6675 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5405 points/GHz
5833 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2517 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5525 points/GHz
2018 points/GHz
TOTAL
18467 points/GHz
15891 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4