| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Ryzen 9 7950X


Description
The 5800X3D is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 7950X is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the 7950X gets 1597.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X is 2.5 times faster than the 5800X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a60f12
Core
Vermeer
Raphael
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM5
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/32
TDP
105 W
170 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
131072 kB
Date
April 2022
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
83.1k points
121.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
631.14k points
1597.79k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X3D
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
40.61k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
24.32k
31.82k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
16.63k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.86k
32.28k (x1.3)
TOTAL
83.1k
121.33k (x1.46)

Multithread

5800X3D

7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
181.41k
683.17k (x3.77)
Test#2 (FP)
236.12k
563.45k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
105.13k
286.77k (x2.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
108.48k
64.4k (x0.59)
TOTAL
631.14k
1597.79k (x2.53)

Performance/W
5800X3D
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
1728 points/W
4019 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2249 points/W
3314 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/W
1687 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/W
379 points/W
TOTAL
6011 points/W
9399 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X3D
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
5020 points/GHz
7124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5405 points/GHz
5582 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2517 points/GHz
2917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5525 points/GHz
5663 points/GHz
TOTAL
18467 points/GHz
21286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4