| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Ryzen 9 5900HS


Description
Both models 5800X3D and 5900HS are based on Zen 3 architecture.

Zen 3 uses TSMC’s 7nm process, still uses the AM4 socket and has up yo 32MB of L3 cache per CCX.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X3D gets a score of 631.1 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1.5 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a50f00
Core
Vermeer
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
98304 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2022
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
83.1k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
631.14k points
434.96k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X3D
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
22.59k
21.2k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
24.32k
25k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.32k
11.44k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.86k
24.22k (x0.97)
TOTAL
83.1k
81.87k (x0.99)

Multithread

5800X3D

5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
181.41k
145.13k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
236.12k
198.36k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
105.13k
85.67k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
108.48k
5.79k (x0.05)
TOTAL
631.14k
434.96k (x0.69)

Performance/W
5800X3D
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1728 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2249 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
6011 points/W
12427 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X3D
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5020 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5405 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2517 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5525 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
18467 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4